Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/30/25 4:07 AM, WM wrote:

On 29.01.2025 15:04, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM explained on 1/29/2025 :

On 29.01.2025 10:38, FromTheRafters wrote:
>

Omega has no immediate predecessor.

>
What is immediately before ω?

>
Nothing, it is the initial member of the transfinite ordinals. just as zero is the initial member of the finite ordinals.

 There is something before zero.

Not in the set of Natural Numbers.

>

And how long is the distance from ω to a natnumber?

>
This makes no sense.

 It is research.

It is stupidity, as it is "research" that starts from provably false assumptions.

 Regards, WM

Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity, and that you are just totally unqualified to speak on the topics you speak on.
Perhaps someone who relies on your statements will sue you for your false statements.