Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/30/25 5:32 PM, WM wrote:

On 30.01.2025 15:30, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/30/25 4:14 AM, WM wrote:

On 29.01.2025 13:46, Richard Damon wrote:
>

We can in fact build an infinite set of infinite sets of FISONs whose union is the set of Natural Numbers,

>
>
Do it. Build such a set. I will show that it fails because all FISONs are useless for reaching the aim.
>

I did.

 If there is a set with U(F(n)) = ℕ, then it has a first element that is not completely useless. But all F(n) can be shown to be completely useless because infinitely many natnumbers are missing. Therefore you did not. You cannot. Nobody can.
 Regards, WM
 

Why?
You are just showing that your "logic" is built on lies and falsehood based on the assumption of things that are not.
Your are just proving you are a total idiot.
Your "logic" says that 36 can't be factored at all.
Try to refute that and keep your claim.
You are just dead in you contradictions, but you are too stupid to realize it.