Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/31/25 5:23 AM, WM wrote:

On 31.01.2025 02:02, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/30/25 2:30 PM, WM wrote:

 

Do it. Build such a set. I will show that it fails because all FISONs are useless for reaching the aim.

>
I did.

>
Show the first element that cannot be discarded without changing the union.

 

Why?

 Because every set of ordinals has a first element.
 Regards, WM
 

Not the empty set.
Note, the fact that the "Set of Required FISONs" is empty doesn't mean that you can't take the union of an infinite set of FISONs to build N.
Your logic says 36 can not be factored, and thus must be in error.
You are just too stupid to see that, and that fact that you just ignore that problem, shows you are too stupid to understand your stupidity, and that you think it is logically correct to continue after knowing you are commited error.
Sorry, but all you are doing is proving your brains is just a black hole that no intelegence can get out of, that imploded into smithereens by the weight of the contradicitons in your logic.