Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 31. Jan 2025, 19:00:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <aaeab94532078a1c6923061a7210b34ba5398a7a@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:47:53 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 29.01.2025 11:53, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:26:35 +0100 schrieb WM:
But its union cannot be ℕ because a non-empty set of FISONs would be
necessary.
Why should a necessary set exist?
The set cannot be empty.
Oh, but you showed the opposite:
Therefore it has elements. For each element we
can show that it is not leading to the aim. Therefore no such set
U(F(n)) = ℕ exists.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.