Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 31. Jan 2025, 19:14:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <9b4d9a9844845f9203750708b33bd6150cf259d0@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:03:22 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 28.01.2025 11:26, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM expressed precisely :
An infinite set of FISONs that has the union ℕ needs a first element.
It has one defined already, the initial element.
No, when it is discarded, nothing changes.
LOL. The set missing an element has changed (their union hasn’t).
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.