Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Feb 2025, 14:56:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <745aba4a9f9d6f908a57920bc217a644b18b777b@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/1/25 8:35 AM, WM wrote:
On 31.01.2025 19:32, joes wrote:
Am Tue, 28 Jan 2025 09:54:38 +0100 schrieb WM:
Here we talk about FISONs.
Yeah, sets of FISONs have a first element.
Unfortunately no set satisfying U(A(n)) = ℕ has no first element.
Regards, WM
Only because there isn't such a thing as a required FISON.
Sorry, your logic is just based on LIES.
As I said, and you seem to admit it because you don't answer, your logic says 36 has no factors because there is no single factor required.