Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 03. Feb 2025, 16:11:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnqmar$1a7ie$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 02.02.2025 21:11, Richard Damon wrote:
Since I don't recall you actually DEFINING what A(n) means, any assumption about it would be unwarranted.
German A(n), or English F(n) is the FISON {1, 2, 3, ..., n}.
The assumption is that U(F(n)) = ℕ.
By induction we prove that every F(n) can be removed without changing the union. Therefore the assumption leads to { } = ℕ. Therefore the assumption is wrong.
Regards, WM