Re: The set of necessary FISONs

Le 03/02/2025 à 16:15, Python a écrit :

Le 03/02/2025 à 16:11, crank Wolfang Mückenheim aka WM a écrit :

German A(n), or English F(n)

 I'm quite sure A(n) is not a German expression, neither is F(n) an English one.
 

is the FISON {1, 2, 3, ..., n}.
The assumption is that U(F(n)) = ℕ.
 By induction we prove that every F(n) can be removed without changing the union. Therefore the assumption leads to { } = ℕ. Therefore the assumption is wrong.

 Anyone able to claim such a fallacy shouldn't be allowed to be put in front of students, in any country.

It is not easy to answer that.
100% of relativistic physicists make the same colossal mistake, and in front of their students enchanted by so much genius, they tell them that
the relativistic explanations are very coherent and very true.
Then Hachel arrives.
What does Hachel say? That we must smash the face of all humanity, that teachers are morons, and that we should, to do it properly, lock them up in Auschwitz, and with them all the theological monkeys of the world?
No.
Hachel, he says that he is like Jesus Christ, one of the biggest dicks of humanity, and that, like Jesus Christ, he says that we must not uproot all these morons, because by removing the chaff, we will also remove the wheat, and that it is better to leave things as they are.
So at the limit, we might as well let the morons teach their bullshit, as long as it doesn't harm, since I, despite a dick as big as a Canberra squash, I let all the teachers in the world teach their bullshit, or worse, spit in my face.
So no, let's not be so vehement with the straw when we ourselves have big beams, but we don't want to know it.
R.H.