Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 03. Feb 2025, 20:31:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnr5ij$1cbur$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 03.02.2025 19:48, Python wrote:
Your "argument" didn't use enumeration. So my objection stands. So does Rennenkampf's.
My argument used Cantor's theorem from the beginning. That holds only for ordinal numbers.
Regards, WM