Sujet : Re: y=f(x)=(x²)²+2x²+3
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 07. Feb 2025, 21:59:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <kZFesw_6KEpEsRM3QV4GrelTAGU@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 07/02/2025 à 20:45, Python a écrit :
Le 07/02/2025 à 14:48, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 07/02/2025 à 14:27, Alan Mackenzie a écrit :
No, such a "new approach" to complex numbers is not possible. You can
define what you like, but you are not free to call that "complex numbers"
unless it conforms to actual complex number theory. You seem to be
ignorant of all mathematics, so you are not in a position to say what is
possible, and what not.
:))
Nothing is funny here, Richard. You're showing how a crank you are. It may have been funny at first, it is not anymore.
Everyone noticed that you removes 90% of Alan's debunking of your claims. In addition to be a crank you have absolutely no intellectual integrity.
Ah oui, tu as raison.
J'ai merdouillé, j'ai pas vu la suite du post, attends je vais voir.
R.H.
y=f(x)=(x²)²+2x²+3
Re: y=f(x)=(x²)²+2x²+3