Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 2/10/25 10:02 AM, WM wrote:

On 10.02.2025 13:37, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/10/25 4:47 AM, WM wrote:

 

"Theorem B: Every embodiment of different numbers of the first and the second number class has a smallest number, a minimum."

 

So, your "Set of Required FISONs" isn't a set of the first or second class, it is an empty set.

 So it is.
 Regards, WM
 

Which just shows that no particular FISON is needed.
Doesn't mean that you can't use a set of FISONs to make the set of Natural Numbers.
As pointed out, your logic says you can't factor 36, as none of the factors of 35 are "required", since {4, 9} and {2, 18} are disjoint sets, so no one factor is necessary.