Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 16. Feb 2025, 19:39:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <865ffa4c4c1091981c5b3b93ddf3dba690cd5ad2@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/16/25 11:33 AM, WM wrote:
On 16.02.2025 13:11, joes wrote:
Am Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:39:45 +0100 schrieb WM:
Therefore all can be removed, and U(F) = ℕ ==> U(F\F) = ℕ.
No, obviously you can’t remove all
Proofs by induction cover all elements of the set. My proof proves that no FISON is capable of changing the premise UF = ℕ.
Regards, WM
So? Why does it need to?
There is no requirement for a "necessary" elememt for the set.
Just like no factor of 36 is "necessary", but we can still factor it.