Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 17. Feb 2025, 20:22:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vp029f$188u2$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16.02.2025 19:39, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/16/25 11:51 AM, WM wrote:
Show the first FISON which changes the premise U(F) = ℕ.
Why does there need to be?
Otherwise there is none, and the conclusion { } = ℕ is valid.
Regards, WM