Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 2/17/25 2:27 PM, WM wrote:

On 16.02.2025 19:39, Richard Damon wrote:
 

Just because there is not individual FISON that when removed changes the results, doesn't mean that you can remove ALL.

 Proofs by induction cover all FISONs.
 Regards, WM

But doesn't prove your claim, only that the set of REQUIRED FISONs is empty, not that you can't build the set out of a choice of non-required FISONs.
As pointed out, and not refuted, your claim is just like the claim that you can't factor 36, because there are no required factors of 36.
Sorry, you are just proving you are too stupid to understand your own stupidity.