Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 20. Feb 2025, 21:13:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <16f941fd203714c7764395347ee1fe09d6502ff5@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:50:27 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 20.02.2025 15:30, Jim Burns wrote:
AXIOM I 'extensionality' means proving each FISON is omissible is no
proving {F} is omissible.
∀n ∈ ℕ: n+1 ∈ ℕ. Together with 1 ∈ ℕ this defines the set ℕ. (*)
Addition of all numbers defined by (*) to the empty set is tantamount to
addition of ℕ to the empty set.
Absolutely not. That would be {N}, which is not equal to N = {1, 2,
3, ...}. It would be equal to the addition *of the elements*.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.