Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 21. Feb 2025, 13:18:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <b8e72bea6b28cca53f4af0747a7fdd50dee59c4a@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/21/25 4:39 AM, WM wrote:
On 21.02.2025 02:18, Richard Damon wrote:
In order to secure the existance of "infinite" sets, we still need the following axioms.
Almost correct, but only singular: we still need the following axiom.
Read what you wrote:
Axioms.
And you had omit some of the text with ... so likely you are just being deceptive again.
>
There is no mention of "induction" in the statement.
The following axiom is the axiom of induction. The set Z contains the empty set as an element and with every element a also the element {a}.
Since you have shown yourself to be just a liar, I don't believe you.
I will admit that I haven't read the paper in the German, but I have studied the general concepts of the theory, and "induction" is not the basis of the existance of the infinite set, at least not in the final works.
Since you have shown your total lack of understanding of the material, you aren't a reliable source.
Since you were just caught in a lie, I think your claims are adiquately disproven.
Regards, WM