Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Feb 2025, 11:40:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <af844d5c4a00022936a6b411e52c73230cdebb66@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:57:30 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 20.02.2025 17:03, Jim Burns wrote:
Why do you think the set has the same property as its elements?
That is not true in general but can be proven in this case.
How do you prove it without induction?
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.