Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Feb 2025, 11:41:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <176ced3dfdb68506e347bc5fa65e22b43d6819b1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:32:24 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 20.02.2025 03:23, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/19/25 11:57 AM, WM wrote:
Note, your subject line uses the word you mean, "necessary", but you
ignore the fact that a set of necessary elements doesn't need to exist.
Assume a set of sufficient FISONs. |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo is true
for all FISONs. That contradicts the assumption.
It... no? N \ UA = {}.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.