Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 2/22/25 5:12 AM, WM wrote:

On 21.02.2025 19:45, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:17:32 +0100 schrieb WM:

 

Zermelo claims to secure the existence of set Z.
This set can be handled, for instance removed from Z. A set containing Z
is not useful in this context.

Z is not a set containing Z; Z cannot be "removed" from Z.

 Of course removing all elements from Z produces the empty set.
 Regards, WM
 

But the set that you got doesn't actually mean anything, as it was just the set of elments that were REQUIRED to be used, not ABLE to be used.
Your argument is just like that which says that 36 can't be factored.