Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 23. Feb 2025, 13:07:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <6deba92b459abe3fdb8e1076765c4c5584acd07f@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/23/25 5:57 AM, WM wrote:
On 23.02.2025 04:38, Richard Damon wrote:
>
No FISON is infinite, but the set of all of them is
Nonsense. No number of a FISON or of the union of FISONs comes closer to |ℕ |than ∀n ∈ U(F): |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
Your problem is you don't understand the terms you use.
Yes, no FINITE number of FISON or the union of them reach the point.
But the set of FISION *IS* an
, just like no
Natural Number is infinte, but the set of all of them, the Natural Numbers is.
Not the natural numbers which can be determined.
But all of them can be determined.
What is the last Natural Number that can be determined?
Every finite set of numbers has a highest and lowest element.
So, if your "determined Natural Numbers" is finite, what is the upper limit?
And if we call that n, why isn't n+1 determined?
Regards, WM