Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 25.02.2025 11:37, joes wrote:Impossible. The set of FISONs does not change.Am Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:55:35 +0100 schrieb WM:There is no largest FISON either. Nevertheless, the number of FISONs isImmediate contradiction: there is no largest natural.There are more FISONs than any natural number: infinitely many.Yes potential infinity. There are more FISONs than any fixed natural
number, but the number of FISONs is a natural number
a natural number, although not fixed.
Those what? The naturals are not sequences.Not those which satisfy ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.because the sequence {1}It does, actually, converge on N.
{2, 1}
{3, 2, 1}
...
has no limit.
Whatever. Induction does not include infinity, although it doesFurther I state that induction does not produce actual infinity.Further induction produces no actual infinity.WDYM "further"? Induction goes up to infinity.
You cannot remove a non-natural number of elements, such as all of them.I remove by induction all natural numbers. What of ℕ remains in yourYou pretend to remove the whole set.Of course. Nobody said so.Only all FISONs = natural numbers are the matter of my proof.The set N is not a natural number
According to Zermelo they make up the set ℕ.
opinion?
The other way around: the number of finite elements is infinite.The elements n are finite and contain the number of elements {1, 2, 3,I didn't. The *elements* are finite.You claimed yourself that induction produces only a finite number ofBut Zermelo claims to produce the set ℕ. Is he wrong?No, you are wrong.
Hint: In fact he produces ℕ_def.
elements. Zermelo used induction.
..., n} which also are finite.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.