Re: Equation complexe

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Equation complexe
De : jp (at) *nospam* python.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 25. Feb 2025, 22:51:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <oVGcjGowSj4Cxn0o7MIiFK1EISo@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 25/02/2025 à 22:47, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 25/02/2025 à 21:38, Python a écrit :
Le 25/02/2025 à 21:07, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 25/02/2025 à 18:21, Jim Burns a écrit :
 
For me, the definition must be extended to all powers of x such that i^x=-1.
 This property is contradictory.
  Absolutely not.
  Tu n'as toujours pas compris (comme tu n'as toujours pas compris toutes les équations que j'ai données pour bonifier et rendre plus compréhensible la relativité restreinte).   This is not inserting a contradictory property, contradictory properties, in all my special relativity, I have knocked them out.
It is the complete opposite of my personality to propose contradictory properties.
It is actually a perfectly accurate definition of your personality. In addition to fatuity, ignorance and dishonesty.

On the contrary, it is a fantastic basic principle that is affirmed.
We extend the property of the imaginary number i to all powers of i. The definition of i is then clearly named, and given.
The imaginary number i is a very useful imaginary number to perform many operations and whose definition is the invariance of its nature whatever the power that we give it.
i^x=-1 whatever x. We see that i is the antithesis of 1.
It then becomes obvious that i^(1/2)=-1 and that i²=-1 as many say. But this is not enough if they believe that i²*i²=1.
Here, there is a bias, we use a real operation on an imaginary structure. We must set i²*i²=i^4=-1.
This is NOT contradictory. It is an intrinsic part of my (Nazi) ideology.
 R.H.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Feb 25 * Equation complexe101Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe73Jim Burns
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe72Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe3Python
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe5guido wugi
25 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe4Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i i +* Re: Equation complexe2Python
25 Feb 25 i i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
26 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe21sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Equation complexe20sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i +* Re: Equation complexe16Moebius
26 Feb 25 i i i+* Re: Equation complexe12Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii`* Re: Equation complexe11Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii +* Re: Equation complexe2Moebius
26 Feb 25 i i ii i`- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii `* Re: Equation complexe8Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii  +- Re: Equation complexe1Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii  `* Re: Equation complexe6Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii   `* Re: Equation complexe5Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii    `* Re: Equation complexe4Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii     `* Re: Equation complexe3Python
26 Feb 25 i i ii      `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i ii       `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
27 Feb 25 i i i`* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
27 Feb 25 i i i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i i i  `- Re: Equation complexe1sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Equation complexe3Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Equation complexe2sobriquet
26 Feb 25 i i   `- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Equation complexe42Jim Burns
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Equation complexe41Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe39Python
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe38Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i `* Re: Equation complexe37Python
26 Feb 25 i   i  `* Re: Equation complexe36Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i   +* Re: Equation complexe5Python
26 Feb 25 i   i   i+- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i   i   i`* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
27 Feb 25 i   i   i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i   i  `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i   `* Re: Equation complexe30efji
26 Feb 25 i   i    `* Re: Equation complexe29Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i     +* Re: Equation complexe2Python
27 Feb 25 i   i     i`- Re: Equation complexe1Moebius
27 Feb 25 i   i     `* Re: Equation complexe26joes
27 Feb 25 i   i      `* Re: Equation complexe25Richard Hachel
27 Feb 25 i   i       +- Re: Equation complexe1Python
27 Feb 25 i   i       +* Re: Equation complexe4Jim Burns
27 Feb 25 i   i       i`* Re: Equation complexe3Jim Burns
27 Feb 25 i   i       i `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i       i  `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i       `* Re: Equation complexe19Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        +* Re: Equation complexe17Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i`* Re: Equation complexe16sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i `* Re: Equation complexe15Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i  `* Re: Equation complexe14sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i   `* Re: Equation complexe13Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i    `* Re: Equation complexe12sobriquet
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     +* Re: Equation complexe8Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i`* Re: Equation complexe7efji
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i +* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i +* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     i `- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
28 Feb 25 i   i        i     `* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
28 Feb 25 i   i        i      `* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        i       `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Feb 25 i   i        `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Feb 25 i   `- Re: Equation complexe1Jim Burns
25 Feb 25 +- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe5Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i+- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe3Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i +- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 +* Re: Equation complexe19Chris M. Thomasson
25 Feb 25 i`* Re: Equation complexe18Richard Hachel
25 Feb 25 i +* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i i`- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i `* Re: Equation complexe15Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Equation complexe14Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe3Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe3Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`* Re: Equation complexe2efji
28 Feb 25 i   i `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Equation complexe2Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   i`- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Equation complexe5Barry Schwarz
26 Feb 25 i    +- Re: Equation complexe1Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Equation complexe3Moebius
26 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Equation complexe2Richard Hachel
26 Feb 25 i      `- Re: Equation complexe1Python
25 Feb 25 +- Re: Equation complexe1Barry Schwarz
28 Feb 25 `- Re: Equation complexe1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal