Re: Equation complexe

Le 26/02/2025 à 20:32, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 26/02/2025 à 20:16, Python a écrit :

Le 26/02/2025 à 20:10, Richard Hachel a écrit :

 

Your new "system" with i^2 = -1 and i^4 = -1 is not even consistent.

  It is the system i²*i²=i^4=1 that does not seem coherent to me.

With no sensible reason. Your "feelings" are irrelevant.

Of course, in the real world, we have for example (x²)² positive.
 But here, we have introduced an imaginary unit, such as i^x=-1.

You are again using "real" and "imaginary" as words in the common language. This is the root of your confusion. I've explained that to you numerous time.
There is nothing "real" or "imaginary" in 0, -1, 42 or i. They are now technical terms with proper definition. THIS IS NOT A FAIRY TAIL!!! Idiot!!!

This is a definition that will not simply apply to the roots of quadratic functions, but to ALL functions.
 Including for example f(x)=sqrt(x)+2 or g(x)=(x²)²+x²+2 which are other types of functions than a simple quadratic.
 I can easily get the complex roots out of it (there are no real roots).

You get no roots at all. Your claims are 100% nonsense.

The roots given by mathematicians are not correct, because they are based on an Argand frame,

This is FALSE. Argand's plane is not involved in the proof that they are roots. You are making up stuff as usual.
There no point in discussing with an ignorant, arrogant, stupid and dishonest person like you, Lengrand. I'll continue to point out your contradictions and lies anyway.