Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 28. Feb 2025, 15:46:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <b0323791d662bc9532e4d6dcd16b8344fd6f5e9a@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/27/25 2:50 PM, WM wrote:
No, I call induction a very restricted number of predicates.
And thus admit that what you call induction isn't what everyone else does, and thus your language is just based on an attempt to decieve.
Sorry, you just admitted that you think you have the right to redefine the words that others use to try to show them wrong,
All that does is show you are a stupid liar.