Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 28. Feb 2025, 20:45:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <6a9b58d713dc4da07865beb841824ebb933e9262@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/28/25 11:46 AM, WM wrote:
On 28.02.2025 15:46, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/27/25 2:50 PM, WM wrote:
>
No, I call induction a very restricted number of predicates.
>
And thus admit that what you call induction isn't what everyone else does,
No. I use only a subset of predicates in order to reduce the noise of misinterpretations.
Funny, using the wrong names for things is the normal technique to increase the ability to try to hide misinterpretations,
I guess you are just admitting it isn't just stupidty that causes you to use the wrong words, but that it is a deliberate attempt at deception.
Maybe we should bring this to the attention of your colleges and see if they think that warrents remving you?
Regards, WM.