Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 04. Mar 2025, 08:39:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <6b5758dbf7740daac4a44583e187b2cc5863064c@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Mon, 03 Mar 2025 22:56:46 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 03.03.2025 20:26, Jim Burns wrote:
On 3/3/2025 3:57 AM, WM wrote:
Zermelo's ℕ and Cantor's ℕ are the same up to isomorphism.
No. Zermelo uses induction which never goes beyond a finite number of
finite numbers.
Cantor claims a number of finite numbers which is larger than all finite
numbers.
No, he doesn't claim infinitely large naturals.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.