Re: The set of necessary FISONs

WM explained on 3/4/2025 :

On 04.03.2025 02:05, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/3/25 4:20 AM, WM wrote:

>

Every set of FISONs which is assumed to be ℕ must have a first element. No FISON can serve as such. That is proven by induction.

 But the claim isn't that some FISON is N, it is that some infinite set of FISONs, none individually required, will union to N.

>
If there is a set, then it has a first element.

Wrong, neither the emptyset or the continuum have a first element.

All you can offer as such is nonsense and infinite deceit.

Hmmm, that sounds descriptive of yourself.