Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 06. Mar 2025, 12:08:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <60614d74-cf15-4e8e-8390-f8861bff44f9@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/6/2025 3:54 AM, WM wrote:
Am 06.03.2025 um 02:52 schrieb Jim Burns:
I think that you (WM) are using a different dictionary.
>
I bthink that you (JB) should correct your statement:
<<JB<WM>>>
>
You need not the intersection however because
Z₀ can also be defined by
{ } ∈ Z₀, and
if {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n curly brackets ∈ Z₀
then {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n+1 curly brackets ∈ Z₀.
>
No. >
<</JB<WM>>>
No BECAUSE
that doesn't DEFINE Z₀
What does your inductive description permit in Z₀
which should not be permitted in Z₀ ?
Anything.
Your description permits Bob, as long as
{Bob}, {{Bob}}, {{{Bob}}}, ... are also in Z₀
Bob is NaN.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjAg-8qqR3gThat you've decided you need to misquote
in order to "win"
says all that needs to be said
about your ideas.
{ } ∈ Z₀, and
if {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n curly brackets ∈ Z₀
then {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n+1 curly brackets ∈ Z₀.
>
No.
Regards, WM