Re: The set of necessary FISONs

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 06. Mar 2025, 20:03:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <a00f5a07-ba19-4dab-9ab4-fae6f0a64533@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/6/2025 12:05 PM, WM wrote:
On 06.03.2025 12:08, Jim Burns wrote:
On 3/6/2025 3:54 AM, WM wrote:
Am 06.03.2025 um 02:52 schrieb Jim Burns:

<<JB<WM>>>
>
You need not the intersection however because
Z₀ can also be defined by
{ } ∈ Z₀, and
if {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n curly brackets ∈ Z₀
then {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n+1 curly brackets ∈ Z₀.
>
No.
<</JB<WM>>>
>
No BECAUSE
that doesn't DEFINE Z₀
>
It defines Z₀ precisely.
It does not exclude Bob.
In order to exclude Bob,
some clause must state or imply Bob isn't in Z₀
Induction says what's IN Z₀
More description is needed.

What does your inductive description permit in Z₀
which should not be permitted in Z₀ ?
Anything.
Your description permits Bob, as long as
{Bob}, {{Bob}}, {{{Bob}}}, ... are also in Z₀
>
Induction excludes Bob.
I generalize 'end segment':
For all x, end.segment E(x) is
  the _emptiest_ set [more description!]
which holds x and which,
for each a in E(x), holds {a}
E(x) = {x,{x},{{x}},...}
⎛ I don't restrict x to being in
⎜  ℕ == its.own.only.inductive.subset
⎜ but if x isn't in
⎜  ℕ == its.own.only.inductive.subset
⎜ then nothing in E(x) is in
⎝  ℕ == its.own.only.inductive.subset
E(Bob) = {Bob,{Bob},{{Bob}},...}
∀a: a ∈ E(Bob) ⇒ {a} ∈ E(Bob)
E(Bob) is not inductive, but
only because {} ∉ E(Bob)
However,
E({})∪E(Bob) is inductive
because {} ∈ (E({})∪E(Bob))
A 'proof by induction' is not reliable
for E({})∪E(Bob)
even though E({})∪E(Bob) is inductive.
There are inductive predicates,
such as K(x) == 'is never King of England'
which have exceptions in E({})∪E(Bob)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjAg-8qqR3g
An unreliable argument is unacceptable.
E({})∪E(Bob) is unacceptable for proofs by induction,
because
E({})∪E(Bob) and E({}) are both
inductive subsets of E({})∪E(Bob)
which makes proof by induction unreliable.

Induction excludes Bob.
Induction alone does not exclude Bob.

It defines Z₀ precisely.
Induction alone describes both
Z₀ = E({}) and E({})∪E(Bob)

He is not in the empty set and
not in the set containing the empty set and
not in any set with more curly brackets.
Bob ∉ E({}) = Z₀ ('emptiest')
Bob ∈ E({})∪E(Bob)
{} ∈ E({})∪E(Bob)
∀a: a ∈ E({})∪E(Bob) ⇒ {a} ∈ E({})∪E(Bob)
Induction alone does not exclude Bob.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Jan 25 * The set of necessary FISONs920WM
21 Jan 25 +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs51Richard Damon
21 Jan 25 i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs50WM
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs49Richard Damon
22 Jan 25 i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs48WM
22 Jan 25 i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs47Richard Damon
22 Jan 25 i    `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs46WM
22 Jan 25 i     +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2Python
23 Jan 25 i     i`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1WM
23 Jan 25 i     `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs43Richard Damon
24 Jan 25 i      `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs42WM
24 Jan 25 i       `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs41Richard Damon
25 Jan 25 i        `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs40WM
25 Jan 25 i         +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs22joes
25 Jan 25 i         i+* Re: The set of necessary FISONs17Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs16WM
26 Jan 25 i         ii +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3joes
26 Jan 25 i         ii i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
28 Jan 25 i         ii i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs7FromTheRafters
26 Jan 25 i         ii i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6WM
26 Jan 25 i         ii i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i         ii i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4WM
27 Jan 25 i         ii i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i         ii i    +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1WM
28 Jan 25 i         ii i    `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         ii  +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jan 25 i         ii  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3WM
27 Jan 25 i         ii   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i         ii    `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
26 Jan 25 i         i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4WM
26 Jan 25 i         i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i         i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
26 Jan 25 i         i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
25 Jan 25 i         `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs17Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i          `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs16WM
26 Jan 25 i           +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
26 Jan 25 i           `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs14Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i            `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs13WM
26 Jan 25 i             +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i             i+* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4WM
27 Jan 25 i             ii+* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i             iii`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1FromTheRafters
27 Jan 25 i             ii`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i             i`- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Chris M. Thomasson
27 Jan 25 i             `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6joes
28 Jan 25 i              `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5WM
28 Jan 25 i               +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3joes
28 Jan 25 i               i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
28 Jan 25 i               i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i               `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
21 Jan 25 +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs865Jim Burns
22 Jan 25 i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs864WM
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs863Jim Burns
23 Jan 25 i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs862WM
23 Jan 25 i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs861Jim Burns
24 Jan 25 i    `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs860WM
24 Jan 25 i     +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs852Jim Burns
25 Jan 25 i     i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs851WM
25 Jan 25 i     i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs94joes
26 Jan 25 i     i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs93WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs14joes
26 Jan 25 i     i i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs13WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs12joes
26 Jan 25 i     i i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs11WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i i   +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs9joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs8WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3Richard Damon
28 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i i   i i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i     i i i   i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i     i i i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i     i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs78Richard Damon
26 Jan 25 i     i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs77WM
26 Jan 25 i     i i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs76Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i     i i    `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs75WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i     +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
27 Jan 25 i     i i     `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs73joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i      `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs72WM
27 Jan 25 i     i i       +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs18FromTheRafters
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs17WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs12FromTheRafters
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs11WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs6FromTheRafters
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs5WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3FromTheRafters
29 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i i`* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2WM
29 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
31 Jan 25 i     i i       i i i `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3WM
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i   `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs2joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       i i    `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1WM
31 Jan 25 i     i i       i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs4joes
1 Feb 25 i     i i       i  `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3WM
1 Feb 25 i     i i       i   +- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1Richard Damon
1 Feb 25 i     i i       i   `- Re: The set of necessary FISONs1joes
27 Jan 25 i     i i       +* Re: The set of necessary FISONs44joes
28 Jan 25 i     i i       `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs9Richard Damon
25 Jan 25 i     i `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs756Jim Burns
26 Jan 25 i     `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs7joes
26 Jan 25 `* Re: The set of necessary FISONs3Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal