Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers

Le 07/03/2025 à 19:00, Richard Hachel a écrit :

Le 07/03/2025 à 13:12, Python a écrit :

Le 07/03/2025 à 13:04, Richard Hachel a écrit :
...

Nothing prevents mathematicians from proposing their ideas, nothing prevents me from proposing mine (validated in logic by AI).

 AI "validates" also that cows lay eggs.
 

Mathematicians pose i²=-1 and sqrt(i)=-1.

 They don't "pose" i^2 = -1 they *define* C and i in such a way that i^2 = -1.
 They certainly don't pretend that sqrt(i) = -1 ! Where did you get this from ?
 sqrt(i) is (1 + i)/sqrt(2) (for the principal value of sqrt).

 I obviously understand what you're saying.

This is very unlikely.

What I blame you for is unconditionally following what you've learned (I'm not saying everything is wrong, I'm not a conspiracy theorist), and never questioning a system of thought that may have flaws.

This is not how learning math works. I don't "unconditionally" follow anything, I started by understanding what it is about, how C is defined, what properties this set has when it comes to mathematical operations and I did so, as a student, by writing down proofs by myself.
You are the one following unconditionally any idea that came through your (very silly) mind and stubbornly refuse to consider *proofs* that your "system" is inconsistent, even when these proofs are trivial. Moreover you have this completely delusional claim that several centuries of research and discussions between mathematicians, that end up in a rigorous definition of complex numbers and zillions of applications is wrong without taking time to seriously study it.