Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers

Le 08/03/2025 à 18:38, efji a écrit :

Le 08/03/2025 à 18:27, Richard Hachel a écrit :
 

i^x=-1.
 

 As showed several times, this is a complete nonsense for x integer, but let's play, since usualy "x" designs a real number.
 Dear Dr Hachel, how do you define the following quantities, for a given a>0 and x real number ?
 a^x ?
(-a)^x ?

Dear Professor Efji.
I don't feel like answering you.
If you want to know something ask on usenet, on social networks, or to artificial intelligence.
You will have answers.
You just have to type:
"how do you define the following quantities, for a given a>0 and x real number ? a^x ? (-a)^x ?"
R.H.