Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 09. Mar 2025, 22:03:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <j8DGUACYSLc7ulW6zTrO5Ci050E@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 09/03/2025 à 20:16, Moebius a écrit :
Am 09.03.2025 um 19:40 schrieb Python:
 
In maths, "no sense" is a synonymous with "inconstant".
 "inconsistent" :-P
 
Your proposal (i^x = -1) is inconsistent.
 Yeah, it's nonsense. :-)
Absolutely not. Dr. Richard Hachel (triple Nobel Prize winner and future Fields) has imagined a new mathematical tool full of promise if we study it and use it well.
He poses a general law using a purely imaginary unit, such that i is a negative invariant, whatever the power we propose to it, and always remaining equal to itself. That is to say i^x=-1.
We have the same thing with 1 in reality.
Now, we have the same thing, in mirror, in the imaginary.
Simply, we must handle this i with care because already, in reality, children and students make many sign errors.
This notion makes things even worse if we use it badly.
It's not a nonsense.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Mar 25 * New way of dealing with complex numbers56Richard Hachel
7 Mar 25 `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers55Alan Mackenzie
7 Mar 25  +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers53Richard Hachel
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers8Python
7 Mar 25  ii+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers6Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  iii+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers4Python
8 Mar 25  iiii`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  iiii `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Python
8 Mar 25  iiii  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
8 Mar 25  iii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Python
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Alan Mackenzie
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers (roots of zero)2Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers (roots of zero)1Ross Finlayson
7 Mar 25  i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2efji
7 Mar 25  ii`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Jim Burns
7 Mar 25  i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers38Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers4Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i i+- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i i `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers33Python
8 Mar 25  i  +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers31efji
8 Mar 25  i  i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers30Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers28efji
8 Mar 25  i  i i+- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i i+* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers14Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers13Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers12Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii  +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2efji
8 Mar 25  i  i ii  i`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii  `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers9Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers5Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers4Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i  +- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   i  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Mar 25  i  i ii   `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Moebius
8 Mar 25  i  i ii    `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Python
8 Mar 25  i  i ii     `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
8 Mar 25  i  i i`* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers12Moebius
8 Mar 25  i  i i `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers11Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i  `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers10efji
9 Mar 25  i  i i   `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers9Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i    `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers8efji
9 Mar 25  i  i i     +- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i     `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers6Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25  i  i i      +* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Chris M. Thomasson
9 Mar 25  i  i i      i`- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
9 Mar 25  i  i i      `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers3Python
9 Mar 25  i  i i       `* Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers2Moebius
9 Mar 25  i  i i        `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Richard Hachel
8 Mar 25  i  i `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Python
8 Mar 25  i  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Mar 25  `- Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers1Moebius

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal