Sujet : Re: The splendor of true
De : jp (at) *nospam* python.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 10. Mar 2025, 21:29:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <pYMOmPU8iuyqFlHSx0HrZD-Pti8@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 10/03/2025 à 21:22, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
On 3/10/2025 12:45 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 10.03.2025 um 18:15 schrieb Python:
Le 10/03/2025 à 15:24, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Delusion:
It is true that my method is much simpler and more elegant to find the complex roots of functions, and that it is much more detailed.
Holy shit! What a moron.
A picture of Hachel/Lengrand?
https://as2.ftcdn.net/v2/jpg/03/62/42/65/1000_F_362426568_9Zmxa9SgYiUcGdIrg9LLxtBfgoJ9IebH.jpg
>
Wow. What is he looking at? ;^)
Gazing his own navel I guess :-)
Anyway I need to thank everybody for making me give split complex numbers a go. Thanks.
I actually discover them (well as *numbers* I knew about hyperbolic geometry i.e. Lorentz Boosts) at this occasion. The sad part is that everyone but Lengrand/Hachel learnt something here.
By the way, did you consider using duals numbers R(epsilon) = { a + b*epsilon } with epsilon =/= 0 and epsilon^2 = 0, i.e. R[X]/X^2 ?
The splendor of true
Re: The splendor of true