Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 13. Mar 2025, 22:11:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <fdcbff701accc10c3d5a15313b94a2a2a042f14f@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:18:01 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 13.03.2025 10:59, FromTheRafters wrote:
I happen to know that the naturals are exemplary of the smallest
inductive set.
The naturals defined by Cantor have more elements than any natural
number can measure. Inductive sets never can leave the domain measured
by natural numbers.
No contradiction there.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.