Sujet : Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Mar 2025, 21:21:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrn653$lt4p$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 22.03.2025 um 21:13 schrieb Moebius:
Am 22.03.2025 um 21:07 schrieb Moebius:
Am 22.03.2025 um 09:34 schrieb Ralf Bader:
On 03/21/2025 11:15 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 21.03.2025 um 22:25 schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>
What was the context of this quote? Was it a letter to a fellow
mathematician, or a in a published work, or what?
>
I really don't know (can't tell).
>
It is from
4. Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten. VIII Nr. 7/8. 417
(the header of page 417 in his Gesammelte Abhandlungen)
>
Where did you take this quote from?
You can find it here:
https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN237853094? tify=%7B%22pages%22%3A%5B429%5D%2C%22pan%22%3A%7B%22x%22%3A0.491%2C%22y%22%3A0.708%7D%2C%22view%22%3A%22info%22%2C%22zoom%22%3A0.454%7D
Zermelo subsumed the "Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten" under the heading "[Cantor's] Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik und zur Philosophie".
Actually, the title of this work is
GEORG CANTOR
GESAMMELTE ABHANDLUNGEN
MATHEMATISCHEN UND PHILOSOPHISCHEN INHALTS
...
IIRC, I've once seen it in one of WM's posts.
>
I guess, one of these is the original source:
>
Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten. 1. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 91 (1887), S. 81 − 125 und 252 − 270.
>
Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten. 2. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 92 (1888), S. 240 − 265.
>
Nuff said (concerning the context). :-P
| Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
| 12 Mar 25 |  The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 451 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 450 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series | 449 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 | The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 448 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 444 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 |  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 414 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 413 | | WM |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 412 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | Moebius |
| 13 Mar 25 |  Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | Moebius |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 401 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 399 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 397 | | WM |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 393 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 392 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 7 | | FromTheRafters |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 6 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 5 | | FromTheRafters |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | FromTheRafters |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" (thread too long, nothing in it) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 383 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 382 | | WM |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 380 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 379 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 371 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 370 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | joes |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 2 | | joes |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | WM |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 362 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 361 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 356 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 355 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 268 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 267 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 266 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 265 | | WM |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 264 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 263 | | WM |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 262 | | Jim Burns |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 261 | | WM |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 260 | | Jim Burns |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 259 | | WM |
| 17 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 258 | | Jim Burns |
| 18 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 257 | | WM |
| 18 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 256 | | Jim Burns |
| 18 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 255 | | WM |
| 19 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 254 | | Jim Burns |
| 19 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 253 | | WM |
| 19 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 252 | | Jim Burns |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 251 | | WM |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 250 | | Jim Burns |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 249 | | WM |
| 20 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 248 | | Jim Burns |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 247 | | WM |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 246 | | Jim Burns |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 245 | | WM |
| 21 Mar 25 | The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 183 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 40 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 37 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 1 | | Moebius |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 34 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 32 | | Moebius |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 29 | | Ralf Bader |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 28 | | Moebius |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 2 | | Moebius |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | Moebius |
| 23 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 25 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 23 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 24 | | Jim Burns |
| 23 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 23 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 19 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 18 | | Jim Burns |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 11 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 10 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 9 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 25 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
| 26 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 6 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 5 | | Jim Burns |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 4 | | FromTheRafters |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Jim Burns |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 2 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 27 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 1 | | Ross Finlayson |
| 24 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 (theory of theories) | 3 | | Jim Burns |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 | 1 | | WM |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 2 | | WM |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The reality of sets, on a scale of 1 to 10 [Was: The non-existence of "dark numbers"] | 142 | | WM |
| 21 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | FromTheRafters |
| 22 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 58 | | Jim Burns |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 85 | | Alan Mackenzie |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 16 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | joes |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 3 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 15 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 7 | | joes |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 14 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | Chris M. Thomasson |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 1 | | joes |
| 13 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" | 4 | | Ben Bacarisse |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 29 | | Jim Burns |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 2 | | FromTheRafters |
| 12 Mar 25 | Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers" [was: The existence of dark numbers proven by the thinned out harmonic series] | 1 | | Jim Burns |