Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"

Am Sun, 23 Mar 2025 20:41:14 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 23.03.2025 19:23, Jim Burns wrote:

On 3/23/2025 1:23 PM, WM wrote:

 

Almost all elements follow upon every defined pair.

 

The reason that we know about these pairs is not that we come to their
end, not in any sense.
The reason that we know about these pairs is that we have an indefinite
description, true of each one of infinitely.many pairs,

So you believe. Erroneously.

Don't let us guess where you think the error lies.

The reason that we know about these pairs is that,
if a finite sequence has a false claim,
then it has a first.false claim,

But in case of darkness this cannot be seen.

Then it can be disregarded.

Our ability is the product of long centuries of intense effort by our
best people.
If someone wakes up one morning and announces "I'm going to repeat that
work of centuries today"
and they _fail_ at their project,
they should not conclude, from that,
that all that previous work was in error.

 
Most of it concerns potential infinity and is correct.

You can't contradict most mathematics and still accept it.

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.