Sujet : Re: Collatz conjecture question
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 25. Mar 2025, 00:54:24
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <JTWdnVWvXvVfbXz6nZ2dnZfqn_oAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 03/24/2025 12:25 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 24.03.2025 um 20:23 schrieb Moebius:
Am 24.03.2025 um 16:27 schrieb Python:
>
it only shows that from a^2 = b^2 your cannot conclude that a = b.
>
Indeed.
>
Are you really that silly or is this just your usual hypocrisy? Both?
>
Btw. Mückenheim recently stated
>
1 & n => n+1
>
(following John Gabriel's lead, using terms instead of statements in
connection with logical connectives).
>
His intention was to express "the principle of induction", btw.
>
You mean "The Riddle of Induction", like Nelson Goodman?
Collatz conjecture question
Re: Collatz conjecture question