Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 17. May 2025, 18:20:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <100agh5$317i$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
Are you aware of the fact that in

{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
...
{1, 2, 3, ..., n}
...

up to every n infinitely many natural numbers of the whole set

{1, 2, 3, ...}

are missing? Infinitely many of them will never be mentioned
individually. They are dark.

<Yawn>

Regards, WM

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May 25 * Re: Simple enough for every reader?17Alan Mackenzie
17 May 25 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16WM
17 May 25  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?15Chris M. Thomasson
17 May 25   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14FromTheRafters
18 May 25    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Chris M. Thomasson
19 May 25    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1FromTheRafters
18 May 25    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11Chris M. Thomasson
18 May 25     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Chris M. Thomasson
18 May 25      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
19 May 25       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Chris M. Thomasson
19 May 25        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
23 May 25         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 25          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
23 May 25           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 25            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
24 May 25             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ross Finlayson
25 May 25              `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal