Re: Simple enough for every reader?

On 5/23/2025 1:34 AM, WM wrote:

On 23.05.2025 01:46, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 5/19/2025 12:22 PM, WM wrote:

On 19.05.2025 01:05, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 5/18/2025 8:30 AM, WM wrote:
>

Your process will not break. One after one the dark numbers will become visible. Nevertheless almost all natural numbers will remain dark. The stock is incredibly large. There are numbers like ω/2 or ω/10 which you will never touch. For every defined n ∈ ℕ: ω/n is larger than you will every reach, how long ever you will increase your visible numbers. Compared to ω the defined numbers are infinitesimal.
>

So, you say wrt a little kid in the womb, well, perhaps all numbers are dark?

>
Yes.

>
Even if its mother says one, two, three, oh crap I have to pee? So, perhaps, just perhaps, the entity building in her womb can hear things via sound vibrations, and or other "mystery" things? Strange!

 For the start use simpler cases like these: The pocket calculator is limited to decimal representations below 10^100, the universe is limited to more or less sophisticated formulas requiring less than 10^80 bit.
 In every system almost all natural numbers are and remain dark - if an actual infinity of them exists.

Sounds like a conflation between real life and math? There is no largest natural number, right?