Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 25. May 2025, 11:47:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100usg1$1b4dh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24.05.2025 17:03, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 05/24/2025 04:44 AM, WM wrote:

Here is a proof, pure mathematics:
{1} has infinitely many (ℵo) successors.
If {1, 2, 3, ..., n} has infinitely many (ℵo) successors, then {1, 2, 3,
..., n, n+1} has infinitely many (ℵo) successors. For every n that can
be defined.
 No, that's not relevance logic, you have just stipulated.
I have proved by induction. One of the basic proof methods for infinite sets.

I suppose you're saying infinite sets are inexhaustible
by finite induction, ..., which is a very classical consideration.
It is obvious, but set theorists claim that every natural number can be chosen as an individual. That is wrong.

Also you'd want to pick another word since "dark" gets
involved in ethnic discrimination,
That is not a discrimination but a description of reality. There is no reason to avoid words like white, black, yellow, red or brown.
Regards, WM
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May 25 * Re: Simple enough for every reader?17Alan Mackenzie
17 May 25 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?16WM
17 May 25  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?15Chris M. Thomasson
17 May 25   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14FromTheRafters
18 May 25    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Chris M. Thomasson
19 May 25    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1FromTheRafters
18 May 25    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11Chris M. Thomasson
18 May 25     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Chris M. Thomasson
18 May 25      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
19 May 25       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Chris M. Thomasson
19 May 25        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
23 May 25         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 25          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
23 May 25           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Chris M. Thomasson
24 May 25            `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
24 May 25             `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ross Finlayson
25 May 25              `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal