Re: Log i = 0

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Log i = 0
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 26. May 2025, 15:36:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1011u94$20v84$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 25.05.2025 19:03, efji wrote:
Le 25/05/2025 à 18:17, sobriquet a écrit :
Op 25/05/2025 om 18:03 schreef efji:
Le 25/05/2025 à 17:50, sobriquet a écrit :
Op 25/05/2025 om 16:58 schreef efji:
Le 25/05/2025 à 15:02, sobriquet a écrit :
There is no certainty in math. But when you encounter conflicting claims
>
Well, that's exactly the opposite :)
There is nothing but certainties in math, since everything is proved in a non-discutable way.
>
Not really.. for instance, there are people who reject proofs by contradiction, so some proofs might be acceptable to some while being rejected by others.
Also, things that used to be considered obviously true, like the shortest distance between two points being a straight line have later become uncertain (with the potential curvature of geometry as opposed to flat geometry).
And there is evidence that we can't even have a completely reliable system where we can prove everything that is true and nothing that is false, since Gödel has shown that any formal system that includes basic arithmetic must necessarily be incomplete.
>
Well, that's true about Gödel's theorem: it says that there exists some propositions that cannot be proven true or false. It does not imply that what is proved can be "uncertain"!
>
In practice, what we call "maths" in 2025 is totally proved in a rigorous way, with the proper hypothesis clearly given. The famous example of the "straight line" is historical and is related to a period of time where the logical basis of maths where not strongly established. We are not in the XIX's century any more!
>
99.9999% of mathematicians accept the proofs by contradiction,
and I really wonder what is the point of the remaining 0.0001% :)
>
>
But the same holds for science. It's reasonable to assume that theories
like evolution are proven beyond reasonable doubt, but philosophically speaking, there is no certainty in science.
 Yes, there is no certainty in science, EXCEPT in maths !
Take any maths book or article, take any proposition entitled "Theorem", you know that it is true forever, without any doubt and without any chance that somebody in 1000 years in the future could disprove it, whatever "science" will be at this time.
That is wrong. Present mathematics simply assumes that all natural numbers can be used for counting. But that is wrong.
Regards, WM
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 May 25 * Log i = 049Richard Hachel
25 May 25 +* Re: Log i = 02Ross Finlayson
25 May 25 i`- Re: Log i = 01Richard Hachel
25 May 25 `* Re: Log i = 046sobriquet
25 May 25  `* Re: Log i = 045Richard Hachel
25 May 25   `* Re: Log i = 044sobriquet
25 May 25    +* Re: Log i = 042efji
25 May 25    i+* Re: Log i = 039sobriquet
25 May 25    ii`* Re: Log i = 038efji
25 May 25    ii `* Re: Log i = 037sobriquet
25 May 25    ii  `* Re: Log i = 036efji
25 May 25    ii   +* Re: Log i = 07sobriquet
25 May 25    ii   i+- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
25 May 25    ii   i`* Re: Log i = 05efji
26 May 25    ii   i `* Re: Log i = 04sobriquet
26 May 25    ii   i  +- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    ii   i  `* Re: Log i = 02efji
26 May 25    ii   i   `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    ii   `* Re: Log i = 028WM
26 May 25    ii    +* Re: Log i = 03FromTheRafters
26 May 25    ii    i+- Re: Log i = 01WM
26 May 25    ii    i`- Re: Log i = 01Chris M. Thomasson
26 May 25    ii    `* Re: Log i = 024efji
26 May 25    ii     +- Re: Log i = 01Python
27 May 25    ii     `* Re: Log i = 022WM
27 May 25    ii      `* Re: Log i = 021FromTheRafters
27 May 25    ii       +* Re: Log i = 015WM
27 May 25    ii       i`* Re: Log i = 014Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 25    ii       i `* Re: Log i = 013WM
29 May 25    ii       i  +* Re: Log i = 02Chris M. Thomasson
29 May 25    ii       i  i`- Re: Log i = 01WM
29 May 25    ii       i  `* Re: Log i = 010Chris M. Thomasson
29 May 25    ii       i   +- Re: Log i = 01WM
29 May 25    ii       i   `* Re: Log i = 08Ross Finlayson
29 May 25    ii       i    +* Re: Log i = 06WM
30 May 25    ii       i    i`* Re: Log i = 05Ross Finlayson
6 Jun 25    ii       i    i `* Re: Log i = 04Julio Di Egidio
10 Jun 25    ii       i    i  `* Re: Log i = 03Ross Finlayson
10 Jun 25    ii       i    i   `* Re: Log i = 02Julio Di Egidio
10 Jun 25    ii       i    i    `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
29 May 25    ii       i    `- Re: Log i = 01Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 25    ii       +- Re: Log i = 01WM
27 May 25    ii       +* Re: Log i = 03Alan Mackenzie
27 May 25    ii       i+- Re: Log i = 01WM
14 Jun 25    ii       i`- Re: Log i = 01Moebius
27 May 25    ii       `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson
26 May 25    i`* Re: Log i = 02WM
26 May 25    i `- Re: Log i = 01efji
25 May 25    `- Re: Log i = 01Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal