Sujet : Re: Log i = 0
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 27. May 2025, 20:49:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <10154vv$2vjq$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
FromTheRafters <
FTR@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
WM wrote :
On 26.05.2025 22:25, efji wrote:
Le 26/05/2025 à 16:36, WM a écrit :
That is wrong. Present mathematics simply assumes that all natural
numbers can be used for counting. But that is wrong.
What's the point ?
It is the DEFINITION of "counting". A countable infinite set IS a set
equipped with a bijection onto \N.
This bijection does not exist because most natural numbers cannot be
distinguished as a simple argument shows.
Bijected elements need not be distinguished, it is enough to show a
bijection.
Why are you working together with WM to hijack this thread from another
crank?
WM's wierd ideas have been thoroughly discredited on this forum. Why
cooperate with him to create another monster thread which goes nowhere?
-- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Log i = 0
Re: Log i = 0