Re: how

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: how
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 11. Apr 2024, 13:07:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <0i01kKYhCcWwtJURV35AV3Oy16s@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 11/04/2024 à 01:05, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 4/10/24 4:14 PM, WM wrote:
Le 10/04/2024 à 01:06, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 4/9/24 8:16 AM, WM wrote:
 
Nope, because ONE set is not TWO Sets.
 In the set ℚ there are as many indices n/1 as are indices n in ℕ. If indexing all fractions was possible, it was possible with indices n/1. But it isn't.
>
I didn't say "N_applied", I said N.
>
But what you can use belongs to ℕ_applied. Otherwise show a natural number that completes the bijection, i.e., which has not infinitely many pairings on front.
>
Nope, you can use ALL of the Natural Numbers.
>
You can use only a small minority because almost all remain unused:
∀n ∈ ℕ_used: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.
 Which ones were unused by e = 2*n?
Those of {1, 2, 3, ...} with less than ℵo successors.
 
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal