Re: Perfect clocks

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Perfect clocks
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 06. May 2024, 06:07:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17cccdfa1194372d$238029$261710$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 06.05.2024 o 01:59, gharnagel pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 04.05.2024 o 17:46, Tom Roberts pisze:
>
On 5/1/24 12:06 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
sane people, as anyone can check at GPS, keep assuming the second
to > > be  9 192 631 770 on Earth,
This is not an "assumption", this is the definition of the second --
that's what these words mean.
>
1) Poincare has said that axiooms are "definitions
in disguise", or something like that. I would say
it differently - anyway, definitions are assumed.
 SOme are, but not all. 
Because a DK idiot is believing and asserting?
See, Harrie - definitions are not physical
entities, your "authority" in the field is
completely self-appointed. And definitions are
really a special form of axioms. Ready to
discuss it, yes, but not with a DK idiot.

2)Could find a quoting where you admit that in the
context of GPS the word means something else.
 The fact is that if one had an accurate 1 second
The fact is that outside of your mad church nobody
cares what your mad church is assuming accurate or
not.
The fact is also that common sense was warning
your idiot guru.
But you can keep fooling yourself insisting that
GPS has inaccurate clocks, why not; at least
you've (temporarily?) stopped to deny they're real.
  per second clock
aboard the GPS, it would tick at exactly 1 second per second, but
it would not appear to from the ground.  In fact, the first bird
up there had exactly that and it didn't tick at 1 second per second
at the ground.  That's why they switched to the alternate timing.
 
See: even such pathetic pieces of fanatic shit
like you or Harrie can't lie 100% of time.
 See?  Wozzie lies ALL the time.
 
On a GPS satellite, the usual definition of the second applies.
 
No.
 Yes! 
No. I could find a quoting in which even
that piece of shit Roberts is admitting it.

 
Common sense was warning your idiot guru, wasn't it?
 The idiots were the engineers that disbelieved relativity.
Your ravings and spitting won't change anything,
nobody sane is assuming that GPS clocks are inaccurate
(because SO!!!) and nobody sane ever will be.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal