Re: A correct prediction

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: A correct prediction
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 26. Jun 2024, 15:41:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17dc94e978f241a8$520$490172$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 16:11, Richard Hachel pisze:
Le 26/06/2024 à 15:08, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>
Wozzie's simpleton mind can't fathom that X and Y need
not have any relation to each other since he didn't
specify what X and Y were.
>
After all, he didn't specify that b was Y and not X, etc.
>
X might be "A bird flew in the window" and Y might be "A
cockroach ate my cheese."  Both may be true, both may be
false, or X may be true while B false or B may be true
while A false.  Or they may be indeterminate because the
events were neither observed nor recorded.
 How?
Python is one of the top posters on science forums?
Harrie is an idiot; he can claim that
Nature Herself is speaking to him and
his idiot gurus, or that GPS clocks
are not real, or that poor stinker
Python is one of the top posters.
Who cares.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal