Sujet : Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 11. Apr 2025, 18:52:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <1ramdrp.6j8jyps41hq0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Thomas Heger <
ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
Am Donnerstag000010, 10.04.2025 um 14:46 schrieb Arius Babaskin Rui:
gharnagel wrote:
Well, I have suspicions about his suspicions.
>
"Nobel laureate Peter Medawar once referred to Haldane as, 'the
cleverest man I ever knew'"
>
I consider his suspicions as "clever" Fortunately, it doesn't seemed
to have prevented a sufficient number from trying to understand the
Cosmic All anyway.
no sir, my paper *_On the Divergent Matter of the Moving Koerpers Model_*
is correct. The abstract coercive conception of the Einstine's
*/_bended spacetime_/* is incorrect.
'Körper' is a German word and means 'body'.
But unlike the English 'body', it is mainly used for the human body or
something similar.
The German word 'Körper' isn't a a synonym for 'object', but usually
addresses biological bodies.
In geometry 'Körper' is used in German to address objects with three
dimensions. Also a certain type of mathematical objects are called 'Körper'.
But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not
called 'Körper'.
The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange
connotation in German.
So you are incompetent in scientific German as well.
FYI: Körper (Physik)
Ein physikalischer Körper ist ein von seiner Umgebung abgrenzbares
Objekt, das eine Masse sowie ein Volumen besitzt.
Jan
-- <https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Körper_(Physik)>