Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 11. Apr 2025, 18:52:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <1ramdrp.6j8jyps41hq0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

Am Donnerstag000010, 10.04.2025 um 14:46 schrieb Arius Babaskin Rui:
gharnagel wrote:
 
Well, I have suspicions about his suspicions.
>
"Nobel laureate Peter Medawar once referred to Haldane as, 'the
cleverest man I ever knew'"
>
I consider his suspicions as "clever"   Fortunately, it doesn't seemed
to have prevented a sufficient number from trying to understand the
Cosmic All anyway.
 
no sir, my paper *_On the Divergent Matter of the Moving Koerpers Model_*
is correct. The abstract coercive conception of the Einstine's
*/_bended spacetime_/* is incorrect.
 
'Körper' is a German word and means 'body'.
 
But unlike the English 'body', it is mainly used for the human body or
something similar.
 
The German word 'Körper' isn't a a synonym for 'object', but usually
addresses biological bodies.
 
In geometry 'Körper' is used in German to address objects with three
dimensions. Also a certain type of mathematical objects are called 'Körper'.
 
But particles, atoms, rays and many other physical objects are not
called 'Körper'.
 
The title 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' had therefore a strange
connotation in German.

So you are incompetent in scientific German as well.

FYI:  Körper (Physik)
Ein physikalischer Körper ist ein von seiner Umgebung abgrenzbares
Objekt, das eine Masse sowie ein Volumen besitzt.

Jan

--
<https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Körper_(Physik)>



Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 May 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal