On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:10:35 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
Mr. Hertz: "Heisenberg (1959, cited from the 1981 issue, pp 95-96)
designates the mass-energy relationship as secure findings, though he
describes the usual interpretation, a transformation of
mass into energy, as a misunderstanding: 'It is occasionally maintained
that the enormous amounts of energy released during the explosion of an
atomic bomb come directly from the conversion of mass into energy and
that one could only predict this gigantic amount of energy on the basis
of the theory of relativity. However, this attitude arises from a
misunderstanding. That great amounts of energy are stored in the atomic
nuclei has been known since the experiments of Becquerel, Curie and
Rutherford on radioactive decay. [...] The energy associated with the
splitting of the uranium nucleus has the same origins as in the case of
the [alpha-]decay of a radium nucleus, i.e. mainly from the
electrostatic repulsion of the two parts into which the atomic nucleus
is split. The energy released by an atomic explosion thus comes directly
from this source and does not derive from a conversion of mass into
energy.'" - "Catalogue of Errors for Both Theories of Relativity"
Dr. Serber, 2nd. in command after Oppenheimer, CLEARLY AFFIRMED (in his
1992 book, published once he got a security clearance) that the atomic
bomb WAS COMPLETELY UNRELATED WITH RELATIVITY AND E=mc^2.
He WROTE "Los Alamos Primer" in 1943, to teach recruited scientists
about the power behind atom fission, and MADE CALCULATIONS that were
present in the booklet, giving results close to 170 MeV of KE plus some
radiation. And the calculations were done by using COULOMB'S FORCES in
electrostatic repulsion, once two (or more) new heavy elements were
produced in the atom fission.
The efficiency of the first atomic bombs was very low, and barely
yielded 10 Kilotons out of available MEGATONS.
Such inefficiency was solved by one of the most diabolic non-human
member of the team (Edward Teller) by using the first detonation to
produce fusion of hydrogen that was stored in the H bomb.
Teller, who lived up to Reagan's time and conceived then X-ray lasers
for the scifi project of Reagan, was a declared enemy of Oppenheimer,
who opposed fiercely to the idea of the H bomb. Teller accused
Oppenheimer of stopping the H bomb development for years, which led to
the trial of Oppenheimer and cost its security clearance and his career
by 1952.
Even the H bomb (also inefficient) was able to be explained by using
Coulomb force (in the inverse sense than A bomb).
USSR augmented the efficiency with the 50 Megatons Tzar H bomb. After
this terrifying experiment, both US and USSR went back to the 1 or 2
Megaton range.
With the evolution of technology, MIRV and tactical nukes, the yield has
scaled back to under 1 Megaton (many agreements between superpowers led
to this result, which is the last line of attack in the case of WWIII).
Different powers now have resorted to the deployment of tactical nukes,
similar to those from 1945 in terms of power.
But, due to the super hyped figure of "the most intelligent man that
ever existed, AKA Einstein) for decades, now we have THE FAKE RELATIVISM
that spread more efficiently than the deadly virus.
The exposure to relativity crap for some time has caused that bright
minds were lost FOR NOTHING, becoming PARASITES OF SCIENCE.
This is not the case of Paul Anderson, even when heavily poisoned. What
didn't work was his intellectual power, unable to produce A SINGLE
ORIGINAL THOUGHT. He's more a parasite living from parasites.
What a paradox!
…