Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 23. Jul 2024, 09:33:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <669f5ce5$0$7515$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:

On 2024-07-22 05:33:26 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
 
Am Sonntag000021, 21.07.2024 um 13:36 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
W dniu 21.07.2024 o 12:40, Python pisze:
Le 21/07/2024 à 09:03, Thomas Heger a écrit :
Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python:
...
The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, hence
that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of science.
 
Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful.
 
But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts???
 
Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would be
told about it.
 
Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth,
Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how
stupid your claims are?
 
There is a far simpler way to explain everything
- There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article
 
This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'!
 
You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+
errors I have found in Einstein's paper.
 
Here it is:
 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view
 
If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at least
a single one.
 
Come on, Thomas. A lot of yours claims there has been extensively
debunked here, by me and others.
 
 
 
Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).
 
Poincare was a mathematician and a very good one.
 
He wandered into physics, because he was dealing with the Lorentz
transformation and with Maxwells equations.

So you got that wrong too. (can't you ever get anything right?)
Poincaré, like Einstein, was an engineer by training.
(Ecole Polytechnique, Ecole des Mines)
He also worked as an engineer for much of his life,
in mining, beside his work as a mathematician.
He wandered into mathematics from there, not the other way round.
He was first of all a thoroughly practical man, just like Einstein.

And the practical problem of synchronization of clocks at diffrent locations.

[sorry about replying over your head, missing article on my server]

Jan

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Oct 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal