Re: Relativistic aberration

Le 15/07/2024 à 18:12, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:55:23 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax)

No, he is a relativist like Hachel, and uses a different geometry for
space and time problems.

 And wrong.

 Prove?

Example: what is the formula giving the instantaneous speed of uniformly
accelerated objects?
Voi/c=[1+c²/2ax]^-(1/2)
This formula does not exist either in Newton or Einstein.

 And does not describe anything in the universe.

 No, YOU, you say that this formula does not describe anything in the universe.

 

Another example: transformations into rotating frames of reference.
>
<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>
These transformations do not exist neither in Newton nor in Einstein.
>
R.H.

 And do not describe anything in the universe.

 Idem. YOU, you say that...
 R.H.