Sujet : Re: [SR] The traveler of Tau Ceti
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 28. Mar 2024, 12:06:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <AccVk766i7wIu7Q6x9gvlca6jgA@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 27/03/2024 à 23:03, Python a écrit :
Le 27/03/2024 à 18:07, Volney a écrit :
On 3/27/2024 8:25 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
Den 22.03.2024 09:49, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 21/03/2024 à 21:05, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
You are claiming that the protons are going around the ≈ 27 km ring
≈ 78 million times per second.
The real value is ≈ 11.25 thousand times per second.
>
Don't you think the physicists at CERN had noticed the difference? :-D
>
But maybe you were joking.
In that case you had me!
>
It appears "Dr." Hachel stumbled across the physics concept of "rapidity". Rapidity is related to speed but isn't a speed. It is related to speed by r = arctanh(v/c) where v is the velocity. The rapidity of light is infinity. AFAIK, rapidity is used sometimes to simplify the math. For example, rapidities of two objects in one dimensional motion can be just added but velocities need the Einstein velocity addition formula.
It is not even that, it is worse, far worse.
Je ne vois pas l'intérêt de ton intervention. J'attends toujours tes excuses pour ton comportement stupide sur le description du voyageur de Langevin en vitesses apparentes, et pourquoi la formule Vapp=Vo/(1+cosµ.Vo/c) ne fonctionne que pour l'aller et pas pour le retour. R.H.
…